In 2025, non-dilutive funding through grants remains one of the most valuable resources founders can access. Grants provide cash financing without giving away equity, making them a powerful tool for early-stage startups — particularly in technology, innovation, research, and deep tech. This comprehensive guide lists the top 10 startup grant programs worldwide, explains who they are best for, outlines typical funding amounts, and summarizes the latest updates and strategic advice for winning them.

Understanding and targeting the right grant can accelerate product development, fund prototypes, support commercialization, or help scale into new markets. This article draws on the most recent program details and trends as understood in late 2025, offering clean, practical information to founders and innovation leaders.

1. Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) – United States

Best for: United States small businesses conducting research and development that aligns with federal agency objectives.

Funding levels:

• Phase I: Commonly up to approximately $300,000 for feasibility and early research.
• Phase II: Often up to around $2 million for further development, prototyping, and validation.

What it funds: Early concept validation, technical feasibility studies, prototype development, and R&D aligned with the missions of participating federal agencies.

Eligibility: Must be a U.S. small business, majority owned and controlled by U.S. citizens or permanent residents. STTR requires a formal partnership with a research institution.

2024–2025 updates: Agencies have continued to expand topic areas to include AI, biotechnology, clean energy, and advanced manufacturing. Competition remains high and award amounts are generally stable with incremental increases tied to inflation and strategic priorities. Applications must tightly match agency solicitations.

2. European Innovation Council (EIC) Accelerator

Best for: European startups and small and medium enterprises (SMEs) pursuing breakthrough innovation with high growth potential.

Funding levels:

• Pure grant component: Up to approximately €2.5 million for innovation development activities.
• Blended finance: Combines grant funds with equity-like investment, bringing total support to between €3 million and €10 million or more, depending on the project.

What it funds: Late-stage R&D activities, prototype scaling, demonstration, de-risking innovation, and early commercialization activities.

Eligibility: Businesses established in eligible European Union countries with a strong innovation focus.

2025 highlights: The accelerator program continues to be intensely competitive, with hundreds of companies applying to each cut-off. Evaluators emphasize clear commercialization pathways, measurable impact, and strong teams. Blended finance options have become more common, and applicants should be prepared to articulate follow-on financing plans.

3. Horizon Europe Research & Innovation Program

Best for: Research institutions, university spinouts, and startups with strong collaborative R&D projects involving partners across EU member states.

Funding levels: Highly variable depending on project size — some collaborative grants reach multi-million euro awards across consortium members.

What it funds: Collaborative research and innovation across thematic clusters such as health, digital, energy, climate, and industrial technologies.

Eligibility: Consortia of organizations from multiple eligible countries, including companies, research organizations, and universities.

2025 context: Horizon Europe’s work programme for 2026–2027 has been adopted with a substantial funding envelope, signaling continued strong support for multi-partner research collaborations. Proposal preparation is intensive and requires alignment with thematic calls.

4. Innovate UK / UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) Innovation Funding

Best for: UK-based startups and SMEs focused on commercializing innovative products, services, or processes.

Funding levels: Vary by competition; individual grant awards can range from tens of thousands to several million pounds, depending on the scheme.

What it funds: Research and development, product prototyping, commercialization activities, and innovation challenges across sectors.

Eligibility: UK-based companies structured as SMEs or with UK footprints; often require economic impact within the UK.

2025 developments: Innovate UK redesigned its flagship grant model in 2025, pausing the traditional “Smart Grants” in favor of more tailored programmes and pilots. This approach seeks to better match support with sector and stage-specific needs.

5. National Research Council – Industrial Research Assistance Program (NRC IRAP) – Canada

Best for: Canadian startups and SMEs pursuing innovation in technology and commercialization.

Funding levels: Contribution funding varies by project, generally tailored to the scope of the proposal rather than a fixed cap.

What it funds: Technical advisory services, project funding, access to research facilities, and commercialization support.

Eligibility: Canadian-registered companies with innovation projects and a plan for economic impact.

2025 priorities: The program increasingly emphasizes a combination of direct funding and advisory support to strengthen innovation capacity and enable market entry.

6. Israel Innovation Authority Grants – Israel

Best for: Israeli startups across early concept to growth phases, particularly in technology and deep tech.

Funding levels: Varies by programme: Tnufa (early ideation), incubator grants, applied R&D contributions, and growth-stage support. Early-phase grants in certain tracks may cover a high percentage of eligible costs.

What it funds: Proof of concept, product development, R&D collaborations, and growth assistance within specific priority areas.

Eligibility: Typically requires incorporation in Israel with local operations.

2025 developments: New incubator rounds and innovation streams continue to open, with a strong focus on advanced technologies like AI, cybersecurity, life sciences, and climate tech.

7. Startup India Seed Fund Scheme – India

Best for: Indian startups at the idea, prototype, and early commercialization stages.

Funding levels: Funding amounts are structured based on project needs and milestones, with substantial support for proving concepts and developing minimum viable products (MVPs).

What it funds: Proof of concept, prototype development, pilot testing, commercialization planning, and related activities.

Eligibility: Startups registered under the national Startup India initiative with a strong innovation focus.

2025 status: The scheme remains one of the most accessible national grant sources for early-stage Indian founders, especially in tech and product innovation.

8. Startup SG (Startup Singapore) and Enterprise Singapore Grants

Best for: Singapore-based startups seeking mentorship, co-investment, ecosystem support, and grant funding.

Funding levels: Multiple programmes are available; grant components are often paired with other support and co-investment structures tailored to growth stages.

What it funds: Entrepreneur development grants, early proof-of-concept support, co-funded innovation projects, and market entry initiatives.

Eligibility: Startups registered in Singapore with strong growth and innovation potential.

2025 highlights: Startup SG continues to refine its laddered support framework, helping founders scale regionally and globally through integrated grants and support services.

9. EXIST and Federal Innovation Grants – Germany

Best for: University spinouts and research-based startups in Germany.

Funding levels: Varies by scheme: scholarships and startup grants under EXIST typically provide financial support for founders and team members, and additional funding may be available for early development.

What it funds: Entrepreneur support tied to academic research, prototype development, coaching, and early commercialization.

Eligibility: Often linked to university affiliation or research group participation, with corporate incorporation planned during the funding period.

2025 trends: EXIST continues to be an important route for research founders to transition technology out of universities and into viable ventures.

10. Australia’s Entrepreneurs’ Programme and Commercialisation Grants

Best for: Australian startups and innovative SMEs looking to commercialize products or enter export markets.

Funding levels: Grants vary by programme, with matched funding opportunities that can extend into the hundreds of thousands or millions for large innovation projects.

What it funds: Business development assistance, commercialisation support, innovation trials, and scaling activities.

Eligibility: Australian-registered SMEs or startups with innovation projects that have potential for commercial success and national impact.

2025 context: Both federal and state innovation programmes continue to provide support, often in coordinated ways that match grants with advisory services.

How These Top Grants Differ

Understanding the nuances between these grant programs helps founders focus their efforts:

Scope:

• R&D-heavy: Programs like SBIR/STTR, Horizon Europe, and Israel Innovation Authority focus deeply on research and prototype stages.
• Commercialization focus: Programs like Innovate UK, NRC IRAP, and Startup India emphasize progressing toward market adoption.
• Scale and impact: EIC Accelerator and Australian Entrepreneurs’ Programme support scalability and commercialization readiness.

Geographic eligibility:

• National: SBIR/STTR, NRC IRAP, Startup India, Startup SG, Israel Innovation Authority, and national programs in the UK, Germany, and Australia require local incorporation or operations.
• Regional: EIC and Horizon Europe require operations in eligible European countries and often partnership consortia.

Award type:

• Pure grant: Most programs listed primarily disburse non-dilutive grant funds.
• Blended finance: EIC Accelerator often mixes grant support with equity-like investment.
• Matched funding: Some national programs require or incentivize co-funding.

Key Trends in 2024–2025

Understanding evolving trends helps applicants position themselves strategically:

1. Rise of blended finance models
Programs such as the EIC Accelerator increasingly use blended financing, combining grant elements with public or private investment commitments. This expands total capital available per award but also requires startups to demonstrate investor readiness and future financing paths.

2. Increased competition and higher standards
Across most leading programs, application volumes have risen sharply. For example, the EIC Accelerator regularly sees hundreds of eligible applicants for each cut-off. Stronger competition means higher evaluation standards for real commercial traction, clear business models, and defensible technology positioning.

3. Strategic prioritization of green and digital innovation
Public grant programs worldwide are increasingly aligning funding priorities with climate tech, sustainability, digital transformation, and strategic independence sectors such as advanced manufacturing and AI.

4. Shift toward tailored and staged programmes
Traditional broad calls have been redesigned in some regions (e.g., the UK’s redesign of its flagship innovation grant), with more stage-specific and sector-targeted pilots replacing one-size-fits-all competitions.

Tactical Tips to Improve Your Chances

These practical steps help increase the likelihood of success:

1. Match the grant criteria precisely
Read the entire call text and evaluation rubric. Explicitly address each criterion and align your narrative with the priorities stated.

2. Present a solid business and commercialization plan
Even R&D-focused grants place weight on market potential. Include clear customer evidence, market size data, and early validation if available.

3. Clarify milestones and deliverables
Panels want to see what you will achieve and by when. Break the project into clear, measurable steps tied to funding allocation.

4. Show a strong and balanced team
Demonstrate that your team has the technical, business, and execution capabilities needed. Include bios, qualifications, and relevant experience.

5. Provide a realistic and transparent budget
Detail how each amount will be spent and justify expenditures. Avoid padding budgets without explanation.

6. Prepare supporting documents early
Letters of support from pilot customers, research collaborators, ecosystem partners, or innovation mentors can significantly strengthen credibility.

7. Practice your pitch
Many programs include interviews or pitch panels. Aim for clarity, confidence, and alignment of narrative between written proposal and verbal presentation.

Quick Eligibility Checklist

Before starting any application, verify these points:

• Corporate incorporation in the required jurisdiction.
• Project fits within the thematic and technical scope of the current call.
• Leadership team has the legal authority to commit the company.
• Budget and financial projections are prepared.
• Milestones and risk mitigation strategies are clearly articulated.
• Any required partnerships or letters of commitment are arranged.

Case Example: Strong EIC or SBIR Application Focus

To illustrate how to frame a high-impact proposal:

Problem statement and evidence:
Frame the customer pain with real data and testimonials, showing unmet needs.

Technical approach and innovation:
Explain the novel aspects of your solution and how it advances the state of the art.

Technology readiness level (TRL) progression:
Define your current status and articulate what will be achieved within the project period.

Business model and market traction:
Include early sales traction, pilot results, competitive landscape analysis, and strategy for scaling.

Team qualifications:
Highlight complementary skills, past achievements, and gaps addressed with advisors.

Budget justification:
Explain how each expense maps to project goals and deliverables.

Final Thoughts — Prioritizing Your Grant Search

US founders targeting research and early development should look closely at SBIR/STTR pathways.

European innovators ready for global market entry and scale should differentiate between EIC Accelerator for scaling and Horizon Europe for collaborative research.

National programmes such as those in Canada, India, Singapore, Israel, the UK, Germany, and Australia provide accessible routes to early milestones, which can strengthen later bids to larger international funds.

ALSO READ: Israel Launches $19M Space Lab to Boost Startup Orbit Access