Lenskart grabbed headlines with its much-anticipated initial public offering (IPO). Investors rushed to subscribe, and the issue closed with massive demand. The eyewear brand, led by Peyush Bansal, carried the promise of India’s next consumer-tech success story. But when trading began on Dalal Street, that excitement faded. The stock opened below the issue price and stumbled before recovering slightly. The debut raised an uncomfortable question: Did hype overpower fundamentals?
The Dream IPO and the Reality Check
Investors chased the Lenskart IPO with enthusiasm. The issue drew over 28 times subscription, showing strong appetite from institutional and retail buyers. Many investors expected a sharp listing gain, as had happened with earlier consumer-facing IPOs.
The company priced its shares at ₹402 each, a level that implied a valuation north of ₹90,000 crore — a figure that reflected high optimism about future growth. When the stock listed on November 10, 2025, traders expected fireworks. Instead, the shares opened at ₹395 on the NSE and ₹390 on the BSE, a discount of roughly 2–3 percent.
The market sent an early signal: valuation matters more than popularity. During the day, the stock slid further, dropping almost 11 percent below the issue price before buyers stepped in. Late trading saw some recovery, and the share closed near ₹404.55 — just above the IPO price. Still, the debut disappointed those who expected a strong premium.
Why Investors Stepped Back
Investors who chased the IPO for short-term gains faced a reality check. Analysts pointed out that the company’s aggressive valuation left little room for upside on listing. Lenskart priced its IPO as if future earnings growth were certain, but the market wanted more proof before paying that premium.
Dharmesh Kant, Head of Research at SMC Global, said that the company’s valuations looked stretched. He argued that even though Lenskart operates in a large and growing market, its profit margins and return ratios must catch up with those lofty expectations. Other analysts echoed that sentiment.
Investors remembered recent lessons from other new-age consumer startups. Several companies that entered the market with high valuations in 2021 and 2022 saw sharp corrections later. Traders now prefer to see consistent earnings growth before rewarding such valuations.
Lenskart’s weak listing did not reflect a lack of trust in its brand. Instead, it reflected a more disciplined market environment where investors focus on numbers rather than narratives.
A Business With Strength — and Challenges
Lenskart built its success story through innovation. The company disrupted India’s eyewear market with a hybrid online-offline model. It operates over 2,500 stores and runs one of India’s most recognized direct-to-consumer brands. Its omni-channel strategy gives customers access to affordable eyewear with consistent service quality.
Peyush Bansal’s leadership also created a strong emotional connect with Indian consumers. His appearance on Shark Tank India turned him into a household name, and that visibility helped strengthen the brand.
But brand power alone cannot justify sky-high valuations. The company faces challenges on several fronts. Competition from both local players and global chains continues to rise. The eyewear segment remains price-sensitive, and frequent discounts pressure margins. Moreover, expansion in Tier-2 and Tier-3 cities demands heavy investments in logistics and retail infrastructure.
Lenskart also needs to demonstrate consistent profitability. While it reported strong revenue growth over the last few years, its profit margins fluctuate. Investors want assurance that the company can scale profitably, not just grow revenue.
The Valuation Debate
Every IPO creates a valuation debate, and Lenskart’s case intensified it. The company’s pricing valued it at more than 80 times its trailing earnings — far higher than traditional consumer goods or retail companies.
Supporters argue that Lenskart deserves that premium because it combines technology, retail, and brand strength. They point out that the company runs a vertically integrated supply chain, which helps control quality and reduce costs.
Critics disagree. They believe that even the best consumer-tech companies cannot sustain such high multiples forever. They argue that when market liquidity tightens or interest rates rise, investors prefer companies with stable cash flows rather than growth promises.
On listing day, that debate played out in real time. The stock fell sharply in early trade, showing that traders questioned whether the IPO price already captured too much optimism.
Investor Psychology at Work
IPO markets thrive on sentiment, and Lenskart’s case showed how quickly that sentiment can shift. Many retail investors entered the IPO expecting a “sure-shot listing gain.” That expectation came from the massive subscription numbers and the brand’s popularity.
But once the stock opened below issue price, panic selling started. Some investors booked small losses to avoid bigger ones. Others held on, hoping for a recovery. Institutional investors, meanwhile, used the dip to accumulate shares at lower levels.
By the end of the session, the market found equilibrium near the issue price. The pattern revealed a classic example of market psychology: hype drives demand before listing, but fundamentals decide the closing price.
Was It Hype or Bad Timing?
Some observers blamed timing for the weak debut. Global markets turned cautious in early November after mixed economic data from the United States and concerns about inflation resurfaced. Domestic traders also booked profits after a long rally in mid-cap and consumer-tech stocks.
However, timing alone cannot explain the underperformance. Other IPOs that listed around the same period saw moderate to strong debuts. That contrast reinforces the argument that valuation, not timing, drove the weakness.
Investors weighed growth potential against price and decided that the balance did not favor immediate gains. Lenskart entered the market at a time when investors have grown more selective and analytical.
Lessons for Future IPOs
Lenskart’s debut holds lessons for both companies and investors. For companies, the message is clear: do not overprice optimism. A strong brand cannot compensate for weak valuation discipline. Investors today scrutinize every ratio, margin, and cash flow line.
For investors, the episode reminds them that subscription numbers do not guarantee listing gains. When a stock commands a high valuation, even a great company can disappoint in the short term.
Short-term traders who seek quick profits from IPOs must understand that markets now reward sustainable fundamentals, not hype. Long-term investors, on the other hand, can view such listings as opportunities. A flat debut allows patient investors to enter at fair prices rather than inflated ones.
The Road Ahead for Lenskart
Lenskart now faces the real challenge — delivering on its growth promises. The company plans to expand its retail footprint in India and Southeast Asia. It also aims to strengthen its lens manufacturing and supply-chain operations.
To justify its valuation, the company must prove that it can grow revenue while improving margins. Investors will track quarterly results closely. Any improvement in profitability could rebuild confidence and drive the stock higher.
Lenskart also needs to balance innovation with cost control. The eyewear market offers long-term potential, especially with India’s growing middle class and increasing awareness of eye health. But the company must translate that opportunity into consistent earnings, not just sales growth.
Final Word
Lenskart’s IPO captured the imagination of India’s investing public, but its listing exposed the market’s evolving maturity. Traders no longer chase every high-profile issue blindly. They analyze numbers, challenge assumptions, and price risk carefully.
The eyewear giant still stands on solid business fundamentals, but the market wants proof, not promises. The listing day stumble did not destroy Lenskart’s story — it just reminded everyone that even the brightest brands must earn their valuations one quarter at a time.
If Lenskart delivers growth with discipline, the current caution could turn into confidence. If it doesn’t, the market will keep the stock grounded. Either way, Dalal Street has spoken clearly: hype sells IPOs, but performance sustains value.
Also Read – Notable Small Business Turnarounds: Bold Strategies, Real Results