The startup world loves heroes. We elevate founders who drop out of school, sleep on couches, pitch with swagger, and seemingly bend reality through force of will. These stories dominate podcasts, books, and conference stages. They are easy to tell, emotionally satisfying, and perfectly suited to social media. But as the global startup ecosystem matures — and as more data accumulates — an uncomfortable question keeps resurfacing: are we celebrating the wrong people?
Behind nearly every successful startup is a group of individuals whose names rarely appear in headlines. They are operators, early employees, product leaders, and systems builders. They don’t usually give viral keynote speeches. Yet they are often the reason a company survives its most dangerous years. If we care about building more resilient startups, healthier founder psychology, and more inclusive ecosystems, we need to rethink who our role models are.
The reality most stories ignore
Startup failure is not an anomaly — it is the baseline. Across industries and geographies, a large majority of startups shut down within their first several years. The reasons are remarkably consistent: no real product–market fit, weak unit economics, uncontrolled burn, poor execution, or internal breakdowns in communication and decision-making.
What’s striking is that these causes are rarely failures of “vision.” Most founders had an idea they believed in. What they lacked was the operational machinery to turn that idea into a repeatable, scalable business. Yet our cultural narratives continue to imply that success or failure hinges primarily on the brilliance or grit of a single founder.
This mismatch matters. When aspiring entrepreneurs internalize the wrong lessons, they over-invest in inspiration and under-invest in execution.
Venture capital reinforces the myth
Venture capital plays a major role in shaping startup mythology. Returns in venture are extremely concentrated: a small fraction of companies generate the vast majority of outcomes. This structure rewards bold narratives and asymmetric bets. Investors are incentivized to look for founders who can sell a massive future convincingly, even when present-day fundamentals are still shaky.
Over the last couple of years, despite market corrections and tighter capital, this pattern hasn’t fundamentally changed. Capital has become more selective, but storytelling still matters enormously. As a result, founders who fit the archetype — confident, charismatic, and comfortable performing certainty — often receive disproportionate attention.
Operational excellence, by contrast, compounds quietly. It is harder to pitch, harder to photograph, and harder to summarize in a tweet.
Who actually creates durable value?
If you examine startups that survive past their fragile early stages, a pattern emerges. The turning point is rarely a single visionary moment. It is usually a series of unglamorous improvements:
- A product manager who finally aligns the roadmap with real customer pain
- An engineering lead who replaces brittle prototypes with stable infrastructure
- An operations hire who reduces costs, tightens processes, and restores runway
- A finance leader who introduces scenario planning before a crisis hits
- A people leader who improves hiring quality and reduces churn
These individuals don’t just execute tasks — they build systems. Systems are what allow startups to grow without collapsing under their own weight. And yet, culturally, we treat these roles as supporting characters rather than protagonists.
The cost of founder-centric storytelling
Founder hero worship has real downsides.
First, it distorts incentives inside companies. When founders are seen as irreplaceable visionaries, delegation becomes harder. Decision-making bottlenecks form. Early hires are underutilized or disempowered, even when they have superior domain expertise.
Second, it damages founder mental health. If success is framed as a personal triumph and failure as a personal flaw, founders internalize enormous pressure. Many struggle silently with anxiety and burnout, believing they alone are responsible for everything that goes wrong.
Third, it narrows who feels welcome in the ecosystem. When role models all look and behave the same way, people with different backgrounds or leadership styles may self-select out — even though they could be exceptional builders.
Diversity and visibility gaps
Funding data consistently shows that capital is unevenly distributed. Teams that do not fit the traditional founder mold — including women-led and underrepresented-founder teams — receive a small share of venture funding relative to their participation in entrepreneurship overall.
Role models play a powerful signaling role here. If the only celebrated success stories feature a narrow demographic and personality type, the ecosystem implicitly defines who “belongs.” This is not just unfair — it is inefficient. Startups benefit from diverse perspectives, especially when navigating complex markets and customer needs.
By broadening who we celebrate, we broaden who participates — and ultimately, what gets built.
The unicorn obsession
Valuations have become cultural milestones. Becoming a “unicorn” is often treated as proof of success, regardless of profitability, sustainability, or long-term impact. Over the past decade, the number of highly valued private companies exploded, driven by cheap capital and growth-at-all-costs strategies.
But valuation is not the same as value. Many highly valued startups have later struggled, downscaled, or shut down entirely when funding conditions tightened. In hindsight, weak fundamentals were often visible early — but overshadowed by momentum and hype.
Operationally strong companies may grow more slowly and attract less attention, but they are often far more resilient. Yet we rarely celebrate restraint, discipline, or patience.
Different ecosystems, different skills
Startup success is also deeply contextual. What works in one market may fail in another. In emerging markets, for example, thin margins, regulatory complexity, and infrastructure constraints place enormous importance on execution and local knowledge.
Recent years have shown that even well-known startups can collapse when expansion outpaces operational reality. These failures are not usually caused by lack of ambition — they are caused by misalignment between growth plans and operational capacity.
This further undermines the idea of a universal founder archetype. Different environments reward different strengths, many of which are operational rather than visionary.
Why we cling to simple heroes
So why does the myth persist?
Humans are wired for stories with clear protagonists. Media formats reward simplicity. Investors need compelling narratives to justify risk. And founders themselves often feel pressure to perform confidence, even when uncertainty would be more honest.
But simplicity comes at a cost. By compressing complex, collective efforts into single-person legends, we erase the real work of building companies — and make that work harder to learn from.
Who should we celebrate instead?
If we want healthier startups and better outcomes, we need a broader definition of success and leadership.
We should celebrate:
- Operators who create leverage: people who design processes that scale without chaos
- Early hires who de-risk the business: those who turn intuition into metrics and systems
- Leaders who hire better than themselves: founders who know when to step back
- Teams that build trust and psychological safety: environments where problems surface early
- Capital-efficient builders: companies that grow within their means rather than chasing optics
These role models don’t diminish founders — they complete the picture.
What changes would actually help?
Shifting role models requires changing incentives.
Investors can emphasize operational indicators alongside growth. Media can profile teams, not just CEOs. Accelerators and universities can teach execution skills with the same intensity as pitching. Founders can publicly acknowledge the people who make the company work.
Most importantly, aspiring entrepreneurs can redefine success for themselves. You do not need to be the loudest voice in the room to be the most impactful.
A healthier narrative for the next generation
The startup ecosystem is no longer young. It has enough data, scars, and experience to move beyond simplistic myths. The next generation of role models should reflect reality: building companies is hard, collective, and deeply operational.
Vision matters. But vision without systems is fantasy.
ALSO READ: OpenAI Pay Sets Historic Record in Global Tech Talent War