As of mid-2025, public markets have sent a clear signal to startups and their investors—profitability matters. The era of sky-high valuations for loss-making companies appears to be ending. Investors now prefer financially disciplined companies over rapid but unsustainable growth. This shift has intensified the debate around whether startups should delay their initial public offerings (IPOs) until they turn profitable.
The IPO Landscape Has Shifted
Between 2024 and 2025, global IPO dynamics changed dramatically. In the first quarter of 2025, 90% of IPOs in India involved companies that had already achieved profitability. This marked a sharp increase from 56% during the same period in 2024. The United States also witnessed a similar trend, where the proportion of profitable IPOs rose from 29% to 59%.
This pattern reflects growing investor skepticism toward companies that chase market share without a clear path to positive earnings. Venture capital-backed companies, especially in tech, once benefited from prioritizing scale over margins. That strategy no longer appeals to public market investors, who now demand tangible returns and consistent financial performance.
Recent IPOs Highlight the Trend
Startups preparing for IPOs in 2025 have taken deliberate steps to reach profitability before going public. Urban Company, a home services startup based in India, recently turned profitable ahead of its IPO. The company reported an annual net profit of ₹240 crore, including a large deferred tax credit. Excluding the credit, its pre-tax profit stood at ₹28 crore, and its revenue grew by 38% year-over-year to ₹1,145 crore. This shift toward profitability gave Urban Company a stronger foundation to list successfully.
In contrast, Ather Energy, an electric two-wheeler manufacturer, proceeded with its IPO while still reporting losses. Despite significant investor interest, the company’s stock fell by more than 4% on the listing day. The disappointing debut emphasized the risk of launching an IPO without solid earnings, especially in capital-intensive industries.
These contrasting examples show that profitable IPOs generally enjoy better reception from the market. Companies that build sustainable financial models win the trust of long-term investors and experience greater post-listing stability.
Advantages of Waiting Until Profitability
- Improved Investor Confidence
Profitable companies demonstrate operational discipline and business viability. Investors trust them more and show greater willingness to hold their shares long-term. When startups list with positive earnings, they attract institutional investors who focus on long-term returns. - Higher Valuations
Profitability strengthens a company’s valuation multiples. Public markets reward businesses with strong earnings by assigning them premium price-to-earnings (P/E) ratios. In contrast, loss-making firms face discounts, even if they show high revenue growth. - Stronger Performance in Volatile Markets
In uncertain economic environments, profitability serves as a hedge against market fluctuations. Companies with stable earnings can weather macroeconomic pressures, including interest rate hikes, regulatory changes, or geopolitical uncertainty. - Long-Term Stock Performance
Data from recent years shows that profitable IPOs outperform unprofitable ones in three-year returns. In particular, VC-backed firms with over $100 million in annual sales and positive earnings recorded more than 40% average buy-and-hold returns over three years. In contrast, most unprofitable tech IPOs underperformed the broader market.
Risks of Delaying an IPO
- Missed Market Windows
Markets fluctuate frequently. A startup waiting for profitability might miss an ideal window when investor sentiment is high, interest rates are low, or industry momentum peaks. Some companies, like Klarna and StubHub, paused IPO plans in early 2025 due to worsening macroeconomic conditions, losing their advantage from earlier hype. - Increased Capital Costs
Late-stage startups often need capital to fund operations, especially when building infrastructure or acquiring users. Delaying an IPO forces them to raise funds privately, sometimes through high-interest private credit. In India, startups borrowed at 14–18% interest rates to strengthen their balance sheets ahead of eventual IPOs, raising concerns about debt sustainability. - Competitive Disadvantages
If a rival enters the public market earlier and gains capital access, branding advantage, and credibility, it may capture market share faster. Waiting too long can leave a company behind in fast-evolving industries like fintech, AI, or electric mobility.
Investors Now Demand Realism Over Hype
Social media buzz and startup media once played a major role in driving IPO interest. However, the market now recognizes the gap between early hype and long-term performance. Studies show that IPOs driven by high social media excitement often pop on debut, delivering average gains of 29.7% on day one. But over three years, many of these companies lose momentum, returning −8.2% on an industry-adjusted basis.
In response, investors now focus more on key metrics such as EBITDA margins, return on capital employed (ROCE), free cash flow, and profitability. Companies that present a credible earnings track record or a clear path to profit within 12–18 months attract stronger institutional participation.
Regional Trends Support the Profitability Push
India has taken the lead in profitability-driven listings. With 90% of Q1 2025 IPOs showcasing profits, the country has shown that investors value companies that prove their business models before seeking public money.
China, on the other hand, continues to encourage innovation-first IPOs through platforms like the STAR Market, which allows listings without profits. Still, Chinese investors now increasingly examine earnings quality, especially after several disappointing listings.
In the U.S., despite early enthusiasm for tech IPOs, investors pulled back from loss-making firms in late 2024 and early 2025. The IPO market in the U.S. has become more selective, rewarding companies with solid fundamentals, diversified revenue, and profitability.
Case Studies Reinforce the Message
- Urban Company succeeded by aligning its financials with market expectations. Profitability before the IPO bolstered investor trust.
- Ather Energy faced skepticism due to its loss-making status, despite operating in a high-growth sector.
- Accelerant Holdings, a U.S.-based insurtech company, raised over $700 million and reached a $6.4 billion valuation after proving profitability and cash flow generation. Its strong debut highlighted investor appetite for fundamentally sound businesses.
These examples illustrate a consistent theme: public markets favor businesses that generate profits, manage capital efficiently, and communicate clear growth strategies.
Strategic Takeaways for Founders and Boards
- Set Profitability as a Priority
Startups should design financial roadmaps that prioritize profitability within a defined timeline. Boards must hold management accountable for financial performance and margin discipline. - Balance Timing and Readiness
Companies must assess internal readiness along with market timing. Rushing into an IPO without strong fundamentals risks long-term value erosion. - Communicate Clearly With Investors
Even if a startup hasn’t achieved profitability, it must outline a realistic and transparent plan to get there. Investors now demand operational clarity and execution benchmarks. - Clean Up the Capital Structure
Delaying an IPO gives companies time to simplify their balance sheets, reduce debt, and optimize their equity structure—key factors that affect valuation and investor interest.
Final Verdict: Should Startups Wait Until Profitable?
In most cases, yes. Delaying an IPO until profitability leads to stronger valuations, investor trust, and post-listing stability. Public market investors in 2025 reward fiscal discipline over rapid but unsustainable growth.
However, this doesn’t mean profitability must always precede an IPO. Some companies in high-growth sectors with strong unit economics and a clear path to profits can still attract meaningful investor support. The key lies in honesty, transparency, and financial maturity.
Also Read – 100 Low-Cost Business Ideas for Aspiring Entrepreneurs