India’s food delivery market runs on two engines—Zomato and Swiggy. These giants compete for market share, customers, and investor trust every day. But what if they chose collaboration over competition? What if Zomato and Swiggy merged in 2025?
This hypothetical merger would reshape the Indian consumer landscape, dominate quick commerce, and challenge regulators. Let’s break down this possibility across financial, operational, regulatory, and customer experience dimensions.
1. 💰 Financial Strength Through Unity
Zomato posted impressive financials in FY25. It earned ₹20,243 crore in revenue and registered a net profit of ₹527 crore. Meanwhile, Swiggy brought in ₹15,227 crore but suffered a net loss of ₹3,117 crore. Together, the combined entity would generate ₹35,470 crore in annual revenue. It would also narrow down the total net loss to about ₹2,590 crore—far better than Swiggy’s solo performance.
Zomato-backed Blinkit, the quick-commerce arm, delivered ₹5,206 crore in revenue and recorded minimal losses—just ₹21 crore. In contrast, Swiggy’s Instamart brought ₹2,130 crore in revenue but lost a massive ₹1,896 crore. A merger would allow leadership to merge operations, reduce overhead, and turn around loss-making segments like Instamart using Blinkit’s efficiency model.
A combined financial profile would excite investors. Instead of backing two competing platforms, investors would see a clear path to profitability, thanks to economies of scale and unified operations. The public markets tend to reward clarity, cost discipline, and predictable earnings. A merger would check all those boxes.
2. 🏗️ Operational Advantages
Swiggy currently operates in over 580 cities. Zomato delivers in more than 800 cities. A merger would expand coverage to nearly every urban and semi-urban market in India. The merged delivery fleet could handle food, groceries, medicines, and more, from a single backend system. Zomato’s delivery personnel could support Swiggy’s network and vice versa, reducing idle time and improving earnings for gig workers.
Dark stores—small warehouses for quick deliveries—could get consolidated. For example, instead of running one Instamart and one Blinkit store in the same area, the new entity could run one efficient store serving both apps. This change would reduce real estate costs and increase fulfillment speed.
On the tech front, both platforms bring strengths. Swiggy has invested heavily in artificial intelligence for route optimization, which helps reduce delivery time and cost per order. Zomato has built strong customer engagement tools like subscription programs and cross-brand integration with Blinkit. A unified tech system would offer better personalization, smoother UI, and real-time logistics optimization across categories.
3. 📈 Market Share and Regulatory Hurdles
Zomato currently holds about 55–58% of India’s food delivery market. Swiggy captures another 42–45%. A merger would give the new entity over 90% of the total market. Such dominance rarely escapes regulatory scrutiny.
India’s Competition Commission would likely launch a detailed investigation. Authorities may worry about price manipulation, monopolistic practices, and reduced bargaining power for restaurants. Regulators could impose strict guidelines, demand reduced commissions for small restaurants, and even ask the company to spin off parts of its business.
Still, the merged company could defend its position by promising transparency, fair pricing, and investments in digital infrastructure that benefit everyone—from consumers to restaurant partners.
4. 🛍️ Customer Experience
A merger would create a more seamless experience for users. Instead of juggling two apps, customers could order food, groceries, and other essentials from one super app. Discounts and loyalty points from Swiggy One and Zomato Gold could merge into a single, stronger rewards program.
Faster deliveries would become more consistent due to optimized fleets and route algorithms. Customers would also enjoy better menu curation, accurate ratings, and easier refunds—thanks to integrated systems and reduced duplication.
The unified app could even evolve into a daily-use platform, offering services like bill payments, courier pickups, and lifestyle shopping, beyond just food and groceries.
5. 👥 Cultural Alignment and Team Impact
A merger of this scale would affect thousands of employees. Zomato operates out of Gurgaon, while Swiggy is based in Bengaluru. These cities have different work cultures, management styles, and organizational structures. Unifying the two would require strong leadership and clear communication.
Many teams would overlap—especially in marketing, finance, and engineering. Leaders would need to redesign the org chart, decide who stays, who moves, and who exits. While cost-cutting becomes necessary, retaining key talent ensures smooth integration and continued innovation.
A single culture cannot emerge overnight. The merged company would have to define new values, redesign performance systems, and train employees for this new future. If handled with empathy and clarity, the organization could emerge stronger and more resilient.
6. 📉 Competition and Pushback
A merged Zomato-Swiggy would create fear among competitors. ONDC (Open Network for Digital Commerce), India’s open e-commerce protocol, already challenges aggregator platforms by allowing restaurants and delivery partners to connect directly. A mega-merger could trigger faster adoption of ONDC as restaurants look for fairer terms.
Retail giants like Reliance and Tata could also ramp up investments in quick commerce. BigBasket, JioMart, and other players would fight back with aggressive pricing and hyperlocal promotions.
To avoid alienating stakeholders, the merged company must maintain transparency, offer value, and avoid squeezing restaurants or delivery partners.
7. 🧠 Brand and Identity
Brand identity plays a massive role in consumer trust. Swiggy built a fun, casual tone. Zomato leaned into sharp design and urban wit. A merger would require a brand refresh. Would they keep both apps alive or consolidate into one? How would they retain loyal users who associate strongly with either brand?
The marketing team must walk a fine line—respect legacy identities while forging a new, inclusive one. If done well, a refreshed brand could carry forward the strengths of both and appeal to a wider audience.
8. 🔮 Future Possibilities
Beyond food and groceries, the combined company could branch into new verticals. Pet food, medicine delivery, courier services, or even home cleaning could find a place in the app. With better data, AI, and user behavior insights, the company could build India’s first truly holistic lifestyle platform.
Moreover, international expansion becomes a real possibility. Instead of fighting for scraps in saturated metros, the company could export its logistics model to underserved markets across Asia and Africa.
✅ Final Thoughts
A merger between Zomato and Swiggy could unlock massive value. It would drive faster deliveries, better technology, wider product offerings, and improved earnings. Consumers would enjoy smoother experiences, better offers, and faster service.
But the journey won’t be smooth. Regulatory challenges, cultural friction, layoffs, and public perception will test the merged company. If the leadership handles integration wisely, respects stakeholders, and focuses on long-term value creation, the new entity could dominate not just India’s food delivery market, but also shape the future of e-commerce in the country.
The opportunity is enormous—but so are the risks. The outcome would depend not just on financials, but on leadership, empathy, and execution.
Also Read – The Toxic Romance of Startup Hustle